As part of the generative, pedagogical and artistic strategy of developing aesthetic interpretations of the data, Gallagher and Lindgren’s work on enactive approaches to embodied cognition (Gallagher & Lindgren, 2015) was particularly useful. Their work among other scholars working in the field of embodied cognitive sciences such as Lakoff and Johnson assert that “our conceptual systems are largely metaphorical and enacting metaphors governs how we perceive, how we get around in the world, and how we relate to other people”(“Then & Now: History, Politics, Philosophy,” n.d.). This was extremely helpful in framing how I approached the meaning-making process and the choice to work with data metaphorically and conceptually through the dancing/performing body. Gallagher and Lindgren’s enactive approaches to embodied cognition allowed me to frame and rationalize a body-led Arts-Based Research (ABR) methodology. Their work in the cognitive sciences also helped me argue that “higher-order cognitive functions, such as reflective thinking and deliberation, are exercises of skillful know-how and are usually coupled with situated and embodied actions” (Gallagher & Lindgren, 2015, p. 393). The process of transposing my collected data into a visual-spatial score and then situating and embodying that score through the dancing, performing body involved a metaphorical and conceptual interaction between the situated body, and the data.